Subject:
|
Re: Line in the Sand
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 3 Dec 1999 00:23:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1655 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve:
> Still discussing:
> <http://www.geocities.com/partsref/bfcspec.txt>
> and now
> <http://www.geocities.com/partsref/bfcspecv4.txt>
> Does anyone have an opinion on whether it would be
> preferable to go with the original syntax approach (having
> several meta-statements), or the newer approach (a single
> meta-statement, with options)?
I kind of like the newer approach.
Play well,
Jacob
------------------------------------------------
-- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk --
-- Web...: <URL:http://www.ldraw.org/FAQ/> --
------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| Still discussing: (URL) and now (URL) I posted an update to the v4 spec just now. It includes the changes suggested by Jacob. Things have been quiet lately, so I want to throw out a couple of questions: Does anyone have an opinion on whether it (...) (24 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
85 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
