Subject:
|
Re: Line in the Sand
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sat, 13 Nov 1999 13:44:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1750 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Lars C. Hassing wrote:
>
> > I think we should drop the CERTIFY as it is superfluous and
> > apparently adds more confusion than it clarifies!
>
> I'd like to hear from other people about this before
> deciding to keep it or drop it. I'll give my reasons to
> keep CERTIFY below. But first ...
I _don't_ think CERTIFY should be dropped, but we might want
to change it to "EXTENSIONS", since it is intended for
listing which extensions to the LDraw language the file
contains.
> - I think it is entirely possible that other language
> extensions will be developed over time, and these
> extensions can 'reuse' the CERTIFY statement to make their
> own assertations.
Yes.
Play well,
Jacob
------------------------------------------------
-- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk --
-- Web...: <URL:http://www.ldraw.org/FAQ/> --
------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| (...) I'd like to hear from other people about this before deciding to keep it or drop it. I'll give my reasons to keep CERTIFY below. But first ... (...) Why not use: 0 CLIPPING (YES|NO) CLIPPING addresses the core issue (can the current file be (...) (24 years ago, 12-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
85 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
