Subject:
|
Re: Line in the Sand
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 21 Oct 1999 14:59:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1511 times
|
| |
|
|
On Thu, 21 Oct 1999 01:07:30 GMT, "Gary Williams" <graywolf@pcpros.net> wrote:
[clipped good stuff]
> I apologize if this isn't making any sense, but to me it appears to be a
> valid issue.
You are making sense, it is a valid issue, I've been missing the boat on
inversion for awhile now, and I'll update the document.
Should there be an explicit statement about mirroring in the document, perhaps
in a DAT file authors section? (Am I repeating myself between messages?)
Steve
"Never trust anything that can think for itself, if you can't see where it keeps its brain."
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| Gary Williams wrote in message ... (...) a (...) Well, what I meant to say is: Matrices with negative determinants may be used for mirroring a part, BUT the matrix should never be assumed to perform the actual inversion. If a matrix has a negative (...) (25 years ago, 21-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
85 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
