Subject:
|
Re: Partsref is Moving to LUGNET
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.brictionary
|
Date:
|
Thu, 2 Dec 1999 21:25:32 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@(NoMoreSpam)novera.com
|
Viewed:
|
2590 times
|
| |
|
|
I haven't gotten any nibbles, can someone suggest a group better suited
to answering this question?
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> Speaking of which... I just posted my wants list. I want hundreds of
> most of the items on it. Someone pointed out to me that if I could tell
> of sets that had large quantities of the parts I might get better
> responses.
>
> Given the current state of things, how would I go about determining sets
> that are likely to be good candidates? I know Todd and some others
> answered this question by hand at one point
<for one part>
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Partsref is Moving to LUGNET
|
| (...) Speaking of which... I just posted my wants list. I want hundreds of most of the items on it. Someone pointed out to me that if I could tell of sets that had large quantities of the parts I might get better responses. Given the current state (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
32 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
