Subject:
|
Re: The Origins Debate
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 17 Sep 2001 02:29:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1457 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ian Warfield writes:
<snip>
Excellent refutation. If Ian had been doing his homework reading what has
been said here before maybe he wouldn't be posting essentially the same
tired stuff all over again that we've all already heard.
If people want to take comfort in religion, bully for them, but I find it
rather tiresome to go over the same old same old over and over again
whenever some newcomer decides to start it up again instead of reviewing. My
hat's off to you for refuting in detail instead of just grousing like I am
doing.
This debate isn't going to go anywhere, no common ground.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: The Origins Debate
|
| (...) Yeh, well, it's never for me so much as for the spectators. :D (...) My only search for common ground is to get the agreement that yes, belief in religion is a matter of faith and is therefore unprovable positively *or* negatively. My aim, if (...) (23 years ago, 17-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | The Origins Debate
|
| (...) It's not nearly so cranky as many of the others, but it's still largely based on anti-logic. Why can't it be the Hindu gods? Or why can't the Hare Krishnas be right? (...) But the physical state of the universe was quite different. We're in a (...) (23 years ago, 17-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
98 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
