Subject:
|
Re: O'Reilly book news
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sat, 8 Apr 2000 01:08:36 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
!
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
2884 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Dave Baum writes:
> I hope people don't get too worked up about all of this. I assume TLC
> decided to put links on their site, then someone had the idea that if
> they used an associate link, they'd get a little extra income. From
> their perspective, why not take advantage of a little free money?
That's certainly their choice. I just hope they realize it's sending a mixed
message. If you don't know how to recognize an Amazon.com associate ID when
you see one, it looks as though TLC is finally (yay) supporting these two
wonderful books, when in fact the opposite is true.
> [...]
> Is it just the fact that they are profitting from AFOL contributions
> that is upsetting? [...]
IMHO, TLC is misleading people into believing that they support the books --
which they might FAIK, who knows -- but there's clearly mixed signals. If
they weren't receiving a kickback, then it would be clear that they
unconditionaly supported the books.
I'm happy to TLC support of AFOLs, but this still leaves me nervous and
skeptical. :)
> Is there a concern that the lego links will reduce the hits through
> similar links on other AFOL sites?
I'd feel the same uncomfortable feeling even if there weren't the same types
of links on any non-TLC sites.
> Although I can see where this would
> be disconcerting, its hardly a reason to get upset with Lego.
I'm not sure 'upset' is the right word. Disappointed and uncomfortable are
closer to the right word. LEGO is sending the wrong message to people who
stop by.
--Todd
> Its just free market operating with respect to referrals. If other sites
> (LUGNET, etc) were depending on such money, then we will need to find
> other ways to support them.
|
|
Message has 4 Replies:
 | | Re: O'Reilly book news
|
| (...) (The above is from April.) I just stumbled across this at the official LEGO Mindstorms website... (URL) worth adding a link to it just for posterity since it refers to specific articles on this thread by their URLs. Anyway, I'm not sure who (...) (24 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | Stereo Vision
|
| Hi As you may know my current project has everything to do with image recognition. I was reading one tread in this newsgroup and suddenly it struck me that many of the problems I currently have in finding the contours of the objects can be overcome (...) (24 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | Re: Stereo Vision
|
| Yup :) I thought of, *after dealing with the mono vision*, going for a stereo approach, because this is one way of dealing with distance measuring, or at least, better object evaluation/recognition. At first I thought of using two USB cams, but (...) (24 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | Re: Stereo Vision
|
| (...) I'm planning to add a RCX to my CyberMaster, hopefully, this Xmas. I've done tests with MotorOutput->SensorInput direct connection and it works, using the Off() and Float() commands to simulate the On/Off state. Using a simple comms rotine, (...) (24 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: O'Reilly book news
|
| (...) I hope people don't get too worked up about all of this. I assume TLC decided to put links on their site, then someone had the idea that if they used an associate link, they'd get a little extra income. From their perspective, why not take (...) (24 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
45 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
