Subject:
|
Re: O'Reilly book news
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sat, 8 Apr 2000 00:10:43 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Sean Kelly <kelly@ad1440.IHATESPAMnet>
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
2838 times
|
| |
|
|
> So I guess I don't see the big deal about that. I'd appreciate it if
> someone could explain why this is a Bad Thing.
I suppose after paying $200 for a LEGO set that most people would be
unhappy that LEGO got yet more money after buying a book from a third party
that filled gaps in their original product.
--Sean
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: O'Reilly book news
|
| (...) I don't really understand how the associates stuff works: if no one collects the referal fee, doesn't Amazon just keep it as extra profit for themselves? Certainly the authors don't collect a smaller royalty if a referal fee is given? So I (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
45 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
