 | | Re: O'Reilly book news
|
|
(...) I hope people don't get too worked up about all of this. I assume TLC decided to put links on their site, then someone had the idea that if they used an associate link, they'd get a little extra income. From their perspective, why not take (...) (24 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: O'Reilly book news
|
|
(...) I agree with Suzanne -- it looks shoddy and unprofessional. I don't think it's immoral or anything, but it puts them on the same psychological level as some random person with a geocities page full of banner ads. (24 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics) !
|
| |
| | Re: O'Reilly book news
|
|
(...) That's certainly their choice. I just hope they realize it's sending a mixed message. If you don't know how to recognize an Amazon.com associate ID when you see one, it looks as though TLC is finally (yay) supporting these two wonderful books, (...) (24 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics) !
|
| |
| | Re: O'Reilly book news
|
|
(...) Yeah! -- Well said! Here's what was going through my mind (and mouth :) when Suzanne showed me the page[1] earlier today: Suz: "Check this out...you're gonna love this..." (sarcasm) Todd: (seeing page on screen) "Ahh, [expletive deleted] cool (...) (24 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: O'Reilly book news
|
|
(...) Y'know, I wouldn't be terribly surprised if if it turns out that the Amazon referrals aren't going to TLC at all, but rather to an employee of whatever web firm they contract out to. (24 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics) !
|
| |
| | Re: O'Reilly book news
|
|
(...) We were wondering that too. It wouldn't surpise me too much if "management" there was oblivious to the fact. I guess if the URL changes anytime soon... (smile) --Todd (24 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: O'Reilly book news
|
|
(...) I also agree about how it looks...which is basically why I don't use an associate link on the NQC site (1). Dave (1) Acutally, I even debated about putting anything at all on the NQC site about my book. (24 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: O'Reilly book news
|
|
I like the mindstorms site.If this small amount of cash help further develop/justify it power to them. I'd rather the 15% went to TLC rather than AMAZON, as I've found them to be a little shoddy in the past. It is good that TLC is willing to (...) (24 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: O'Reilly book news
|
|
(...) (The above is from April.) I just stumbled across this at the official LEGO Mindstorms website... (URL) worth adding a link to it just for posterity since it refers to specific articles on this thread by their URLs. Anyway, I'm not sure who (...) (24 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Stereo Vision
|
|
Hi As you may know my current project has everything to do with image recognition. I was reading one tread in this newsgroup and suddenly it struck me that many of the problems I currently have in finding the contours of the objects can be overcome (...) (24 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Stereo Vision
|
|
Yup :) I thought of, *after dealing with the mono vision*, going for a stereo approach, because this is one way of dealing with distance measuring, or at least, better object evaluation/recognition. At first I thought of using two USB cams, but (...) (24 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Stereo Vision
|
|
(...) I'm planning to add a RCX to my CyberMaster, hopefully, this Xmas. I've done tests with MotorOutput->SensorInput direct connection and it works, using the Off() and Float() commands to simulate the On/Off state. Using a simple comms rotine, (...) (24 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Stereo Vision
|
|
in article 4.3.2.7.0.2000081010...rktest.pt, Laurentino Martins at lego-robotics@crynwr.com wrote on 8/10/00 3:05 AM: (...) Always! You can rely on me to have thoughts. No guarantees about the usefulness of my thoughts, however. Use at your own (...) (24 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Stereo Vision (aka mirrors)
|
|
(...) many (...) can be (...) Cool :) that might work too, and save about the other half of material to be used (+2 mirrors, +1 motor, +1 angle-sensor). er... I feel like having "my" solution simply slashed in the middle ;) eheheh This is really all (...) (24 years ago, 11-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Stereo Vision
|
|
This approach has several problems. One is that the left image will show you smaller objects than the right, because the light travels a greater distance. The second is that precision is very important and the mirrors must be fixed otherwise will (...) (24 years ago, 11-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Stereo Vision (docs)
|
|
Check this out ;) Recognizing Three-Dimensional Objects by Comparing Two-Dimensional Images. Daniel P. Huttenlocher, Liana M. Lorigo. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. June 1996, San Francisco, CA, USA (URL) C. aka McViper (24 years ago, 11-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
