Subject:
|
Re: Character Subcategories
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Sun, 30 Jan 2000 12:55:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1977 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Pawel Nazarewicz writes:
> Seeing as the list of characters will prove to be extensive, what would be a
> good way to categorize it (similiar question to structures)? My thoughts on the
> general segregation so far are:
>
> 1) Villager - your standard folks
> 2) Knight - your warriors by profession (part of bigger whole)
> 3) Rogue - lone adventure seekers
> 4) Leader - the main person in a group of any kind
> 5) Warrior - a lone Knight
> 6) Sailor - sails the Legoceania
> 7) Merchant - sells goods or services
> 8) Traveler - wanders the known land
> 9) Explorer - seeks to discover the unknown land
> 10) Outlaw - wanted by the law in a specific kingdom - or all of them?
> 11) Servant - serves Royalty
> 12) Royalty - Kings, Queens, Barons, Lords, etc...
> 13) Priest or Priestess - uses non-attacking Magic, as well as your regular
> church minifig (healers, etc)
> 14) Sorcerer or Sorceress - plenty of attacking Magic, fortune teller, etc.
> 15) Public Servant - Judges, etc...
>
> I'm sure I'm missing something, but for example wizard would be a subcategory of
> Sorcerer, as would Necromancer, mage, etc... Thanks for your input.
>
> -- pn
p ~
i think interesting allowances could be made so that "gypsies and nomads"
could be added to the list. their Realm could be made to "float" over
unoccupied Realm spaces. interesting, no?
later ~ craig~
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Character Subcategories
|
| Seeing as the list of characters will prove to be extensive, what would be a good way to categorize it (similiar question to structures)? My thoughts on the general segregation so far are: 1) Villager - your standard folks 2) Knight - your warriors (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
