 | | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| [ Still discussing (URL) ] Steve: (...) [...] (...) "INVERTNEXT" is good. It makes the effect much more clear. (...) It gets much too messy when you mix the states of a parameter and the setting of that parameter. CERTIFY BFC does imply CLIPPING ON, (...) (24 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| (...) OK, I'll change this in the document. Changes from the last few days will be uploaded to GeoCities in the next hour or so. Steve (24 years ago, 12-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| (...) Did you mean you=Steve or you=anyone? (...) I agree, the sequence should be illegal. My point was, does CERTIFY BFC change the value of the internal local_clipping variable, or not? My intention was that it does not. From a practical (...) (24 years ago, 12-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| [ Still discussing (URL) ] Steve: (...) You=anyone (kind of - English is a very imprecise language - "on" in French, "man" in Danish, ...) (...) That depends on how the program is written. You could imagine that the variable "local_clipping" isn't (...) (24 years ago, 13-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| Steve Bliss wrote ... (...) I think your pseudo-code delivers a fine evidence why the CERTIFY is unnecessary ;-) /Lars (24 years ago, 13-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| Oops! Forget a few important details in the psuedo-code! (...) The last line above should be: (AccumClip and LocalClip and (Winding != UNKNOWN) and Certified), (...) And the line above should be: If AccumClip and LocalClip And Certified Then (...) (24 years ago, 15-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| Steve Bliss wrote in message ... (...) No, WINDING is local! It does not affect subfiles, this is the very reason why we have invented the CLIPPING command. /Lars (24 years ago, 15-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| (...) Argh. You are correct, sir. Serves me right, trying to post quickly. Here's a correction: (...) Steve (24 years ago, 15-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
