 | | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| Steve Bliss wrote in message <380e2b8e.12563517@l...et.com>... (...) An orientation matrix doesn't contain enough information to invert an asymmetrical part; if you assume it does, this would result in a part with a mirrored shape. I propose that (...) (25 years ago, 21-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| Gary Williams wrote in message ... (...) a (...) Well, what I meant to say is: Matrices with negative determinants may be used for mirroring a part, BUT the matrix should never be assumed to perform the actual inversion. If a matrix has a negative (...) (25 years ago, 21-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| On Thu, 21 Oct 1999 01:07:30 GMT, "Gary Williams" <graywolf@pcpros.net> wrote: [clipped good stuff] (...) You are making sense, it is a valid issue, I've been missing the boat on inversion for awhile now, and I'll update the document. Should there (...) (25 years ago, 21-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
