|
|
| |
In lugnet.robotics, Hakan Tandogan wrote:
> In lugnet.robotics, Mick Marriott wrote:
> > I posted this link ages ago and it didn't seem to work.
> >
> > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=63383
> >
> > Here are some photos of a wirelss camera I made for my setup.
> > It is powered by a single motor port and the footage is then captured via a TV
> > card in my PC.
> >
> > You can also just run it from a 9v battery.
> > The range is excellent and far outreaches the range of a RCX or Spybotic module.
> >
> > I have found the best unit to use this camera on is the cybermaster as the RF
> > functionality lends itself well to long range applications.
> >
> > Any questions please drop me a line.
>
> Could you post direct links to your pictures? I'm quite interested in your
> wireless setup. It wouldn't by any chance fit into a monorail car (4 wide, could
> be made 6 wide) ...
>
>
> Bye,
> Hakan
Sorry Brickshelf doesn't seem to be clearing my images.
I have sent them to you direct.
As for the link someone has just posted I got my camera for £10 sterling off of
Ebay.
I know they are a little dearer these days, but no where near $110.
All you need is the camera and a receiver just do a search for wireless camera.
You should be able to get one for around $30.
Brick parts cost pence.
Cheers
Mick
|
|
| |
In lugnet.robotics, Mick Marriott wrote:
> I posted this link ages ago and it didn't seem to work.
>
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=63383
>
> Here are some photos of a wirelss camera I made for my setup.
> It is powered by a single motor port and the footage is then captured via a TV
> card in my PC.
>
> You can also just run it from a 9v battery.
> The range is excellent and far outreaches the range of a RCX or Spybotic module.
>
> I have found the best unit to use this camera on is the cybermaster as the RF
> functionality lends itself well to long range applications.
>
> Any questions please drop me a line.
Could you post direct links to your pictures? I'm quite interested in your
wireless setup. It wouldn't by any chance fit into a monorail car (4 wide, could
be made 6 wide) ...
Bye,
Hakan
|
|
| |
I posted this link ages ago and it didn't seem to work.
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=63383
Here are some photos of a wirelss camera I made for my setup.
It is powered by a single motor port and the footage is then captured via a TV
card in my PC.
You can also just run it from a 9v battery.
The range is excellent and far outreaches the range of a RCX or Spybotic module.
I have found the best unit to use this camera on is the cybermaster as the RF
functionality lends itself well to long range applications.
Any questions please drop me a line.
Mick
|
|
| |
Many Mindstorms RIS 2.0/RCX2 users like you want the ability to control their
Lego creations (robots, webcams, etc.) over the Internet using a 'plug-in free'
JAVA client interface. Currently only RIS 1.x users have the ability to easily
perform this function using the readily available third-party software written
specifically for their versions. For this reason I have created a project
webpage in hopes of bringing interested RIS 2.0 users together, in a group
effort, to find a solution to this 2.0 shortcoming
Please refer to:
http://gorts_odyssey.home.att.net/lego_internet_control.htm
-or-
http://home.att.net/~gorts_odyssey/lego_internet_control.htm
|
|
| |
Actually WebRCX beta 3 has USB support.
Plus I'm working on my own program (which eventually will support USB)
which hopefully will include support for streaming webcam images as well.
-AK
--
------------
My website: http://legographics.idwt.net/
The LEGOCam: http://legographics.idwt.net/legocam
David wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking for a simple solution (that could work under windows XP) to
> control my RCX via internet (the best solution for me would be a web page) -
> For exemple, controling the robot in my home while i'm at work.
> I found two tools :
> - WebRCX (http://www.sckans.edu/~sireland/webcam/webrcx/)
> - WebBrick (http://popbubble.com/Lego/WebBrick/)
>
> Unfortunately, both are working with COM ports.
> I've got the USB tower, so WebRCX and WebBrick can't work with my
> configuration.
>
> As someone a solution ? (using a vitual com port, another tool that could
> work...)
>
> thanks,
> david
>
>
>
>
|
|
|
