 | | Re: Preserving old-school Mindstorms resources
|
|
(...) Nice to see a few of us share the interest. :-) The best I can offer for a list of patches is what I listed in the post here [ (URL) ], along with Carl's follow-up post. That list was culled from links I've collected over the years. As was (...) (15 years ago, 14-Apr-09, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Preserving old-school Mindstorms resources
|
|
After surfing through many sites, and (sadly) even more 404s I have been unable to find a definitive list of gcc, binutils, BrickOS etc. versions and patches that I should and could be using. Presumably everybody here has up to date versions of all (...) (15 years ago, 13-Apr-09, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Preserving old-school Mindstorms resources
|
|
Hi all Lately I've noticed a lot of old-school Lego Mindstorm resources are starting to disappear from teh webz. I've blagged about wanting to preserve this stuff here: (URL) the-brick If anyone knows of any resources you think should be maintained (...) (15 years ago, 12-Apr-09, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickOS Patches and Development
|
|
(...) I have found the following related to the removal of h8300-*-hms from binutils: 1) (3 URLs) current Debian version of binutils-h8300-hms is 2.16.1-8 - (URL) the package page ( (URL) ), there is a downloadable *.diff.gz file. That diff file, (...) (15 years ago, 5-Apr-09, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickOS Patches and Development
|
|
Hi, (...) I had worked to assimilate those patches prior to the second version of the performance patch being posted, so I'm glad to hear that it also works well. (...) When I went back through to add TCP support to other things, that "similar but (...) (15 years ago, 4-Apr-09, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickOS Patches and Development
|
|
Hello, 2009/3/31 Carl Troein <carl@thep.lu.se>: (...) For some unknown reason the address suddenly pointed to the old server again which was shutdown in December last year. I noticed it myself only by chance. It seems that the dyndns record has (...) (15 years ago, 31-Mar-09, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickOS Patches and Development
|
|
(...) Case in point: when I first started on this post some weeks(!) ago, hoenicke.ath.cx wasn't responding. (...) And it's not getting easier if we've collected different sets of patches and then make further changes based on those... So yeah, we (...) (15 years ago, 31-Mar-09, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | BrickOS Patches and Development
|
|
Greetings, This is a follow up to earlier postings discussing the development status of BrickOS. While the Sourceforge project has not had much activity of late, I've come across various modifications that, unfortunately, have never made it (...) (15 years ago, 15-Feb-09, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Development status
|
|
(...) I think we need to stick with 2.16.1, I don't know whether porting brickos to elf is really worth the trouble. Newer gcc versions would be nice, indeed, and brickos also builds fine with (some of?) these, but I never actually got it to run on (...) (15 years ago, 31-Jan-09, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Development status
|
|
Hi all, This is great to see there's still some interest. I may not have opportunity to post over the next couple days, but I have created some patches against the latest Sourceforge CVS (as I believe there are a few differences between the CVS and (...) (15 years ago, 30-Jan-09, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
