Subject:
|
Re: Development status
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:31:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
32354 times
|
| |
|
|
Hi all,
This is great to see there's still some interest. I may not have
opportunity to post over the next couple days, but I have created some
patches against the latest Sourceforge CVS (as I believe there are a few
differences between the CVS and the last release). I have an Open Document
Spreadsheet detailing the patch changes (source, reason, etc.). When I get
back, I'll try to upload the files somewhere.
I had also been in the process of gathering and/or creating some patches
against other BrickOS versions--there was an lnp_printf, lnp_reliable, some
task-related (priority inheritance, scheduling, resources), realloc....
After Bibo was released, I didn't pursue these as aggressively.
I've been working with binutils 2.16.1 and gcc 3.4.6--I noticed the same
disappearance in 2.17.
Cheers,
Matthew
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Development status
|
| (...) I think we need to stick with 2.16.1, I don't know whether porting brickos to elf is really worth the trouble. Newer gcc versions would be nice, indeed, and brickos also builds fine with (some of?) these, but I never actually got it to run on (...) (15 years ago, 31-Jan-09, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Development status
|
| (...) From what I can tell, support for h8300-hitachi-hms(/coff) was dropped from binutils after 2.16.1. I have no real idea how much work it would take to port brickOS (plus brickemu, preferably) over to elf, but I suspect that it'd be a lot. (...) (15 years ago, 29-Jan-09, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
