To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 4927
4926  |  4928
Subject: 
Re: Some comments (long) (was: Something else is needed, I think...)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Thu, 6 May 1999 21:09:46 GMT
Viewed: 
913 times
  
Some comments on what Chris Phillips wrote:

- as far as I know, you will not be able to implement floating point in
   byte code, it will be too inefficient (mostly in terms of space)
- agreed, current firmware does not support fixed point well, and it is
   because they do not allow 32-bit values
- yes, you need 32-bit values for usable fixed point in byte code
- muldiv also useful
- muldiv not supported natively by H8
- have you considered writing native code?

-Kekoa



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Some comments (long) (was: Something else is needed, I think...)
 
Kekoa Proudfoot wrote in message ... (...) Do you think it would be possible with improved firmware to support inline H8 code embedded in a user program? For example, a special byte code could indicate that the following code should be executed (...) (25 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Some comments (long) (was: Something else is needed, I think...)
 
Mark Tarrabain wrote in message <3730DE97.EFB3BF9A@l....bc.ca>... (...) It is probably true that a floating-point library cannot (should not?) be built into the firmware. It would probably be better for this to be supported by the compiler(s). But (...) (25 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.robotics)

42 Messages in This Thread:













Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR