Subject:
|
Re: Some comments (long)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 May 1999 13:34:33 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Laurentino Martins <LMARTINS@MARKTEST.nospamPT>
|
Viewed:
|
965 times
|
| |
|
|
At 13:32 06-05-1999 Thursday , you wrote:
> On Thu, 6 May 1999, Mark Tarrabain wrote:
>
> > I think that what may actually be the best thing for the RCX in
> > terms of a new bytecode interpreter is one which is virtually a plug-in
> > replacement for the old one. I've been doing some extensive mulling
> <snip>
>
> Mark and John's messages this morning look like the beginnings of
> two separate developments for the RCX, both of which have the potential to
> satisfy the needs of many who are dissatisfied with the current firmware.
> Hopefully both ideas will be successful - and if they are, then they will
> be hugely useful.
>
> My current wish-list and computing skills place me firmly in the "add a
> few opcodes to the existing firmware" camp - and I'm extremely willing to
> assist in the development effort of such an add-on. I suggest that a small
> group should get together (off the list) and come up with a definite
> specification, which we could then implement. Would someone like to
> volunteer to lead the effort? (Don't look at me - I still have to learn a
> lot about the H8 and install a compiler!)
>
> If a similar group is going to try JVM, then I'd like to wish them every
> success :-)
I was wondering if any of these projects is thinking in providing enough flexibility that would make possible for anyone smoothly integrate new sensors with the currently supported ones? (Like Dennis Clark's RCX IRPD?)
Sorry to return to this, but any is going to provide some connection to the PC with some library, or even remote debugging capabilities?
Sorry to insist, but my latest projects are involving a lot of processing power and memory lately and I need the help of a PC...
Laurentino Martins
[mailto:lau@mail.telepac.pt]
[http://www.terravista.pt/Enseada/2808/]
--
Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Some comments (long)
|
| (...) Absolutely. What I have in mind is that the basic level of access is to the raw sensor value of the A/D converter and whether it is active or passive. The interpretation of that value would be done by other classes. For example, I would like (...) (25 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
