Subject:
|
Re: new Thomas the Tank Engine sets
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Tue, 3 Oct 2006 11:11:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2752 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.au, Kerry Raymond wrote:
~snip~
> I also gave my niece (just 2) some of the Duplo Zoo sets with lots of
> animals (which she also liked). One strange thing that I had not previously
> realised is that the stub on the backs of some of the animals isn't the
> normal size. We discovered this when Harold the Helicopter went to rescue a
> zoo animal -- Harold can pick up trains with studs on top but not animals. I
> wonder why it is not a normal Duplo sized stud? >
~snip~
I just had to wander across to The Bunk's Duplo pile and check this out. As I'm
doing this I stated loudly what I was up to and the NLSO informed me that she
had informed me of such an occurrence ages ago. I could see where this was
heading in regards to marital communication topics. I advised that any future
comments regarding LEGO company products be communicated in the form of a lugnet
post, so as to ensure a timely and appropriate response.
Anyway.....where was I ? Yes a Duplo man can sit on a leopard's back, but cannot
stand on the leopard's back. A 2 x 2 Duplo brick can be centred on a leopard's
back by inserting the back-stud into the centre-tube. Hmmm...
pete.w
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: new Thomas the Tank Engine sets
|
| Well, the 3300 Harold the Helicopter turned out to be an absolute hit with my Thomas-loving nephew (just turned 4). It's got very high play-ability. For those of you not exposed to the world of Thomas the Tank Engine, Harold the Helicopter is (...) (18 years ago, 2-Oct-06, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
