Subject:
|
Re: Announcing new set database
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.database
|
Date:
|
Fri, 15 Sep 2000 15:11:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3425 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.database, John VanZwieten writes:
<snip>
> Todd,
>
> The new stuff is great! How about a ranking system similar to
> Fibblesnork? Except mayby a ranking for part selection rather than
> alternate models. I've always found the multi-dimensional ranking on
> Fibblesnork very helpfull in choosing what sets to pursue.
I agree with John on this one. Both a ranking for the Set and for the Part
Selection would be nice. The biggest example of this would be 7151-Sith
Infiltraitor http://guide.lugnet.com/set/7151 . Poor Set in terms of the Model
but a great Parts set.
Eric Kingsley
The New England LEGO Users Group
http://www.nelug.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Announcing new set database
|
| "Todd & Suz" <admin@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:G0wo9C.B4I@lugnet.com... (...) through. (...) get (...) LUGNET (...) set (...) want-to-sell. (...) by (...) page. (...) Todd, The new stuff is great! How about a ranking system similar to (...) (24 years ago, 15-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
74 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|
|
|
