| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote:
| |
Those guys are worthless.
Dave K
|
You can say that again! ;-)
JOHN
|
Is there a silliest post contest running that I was not informed of?
|
No, but there is a bad grammar contest running; are you planning on entering
this post?
JOHN
|
|
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote:
| |
Those guys are worthless.
Dave K
|
You can say that again! ;-)
JOHN
|
Is there a silliest post contest running that I was not informed of?
|
No, but there is a bad grammar contest running; are you planning on entering
this post?
JOHN
|
Yet another contest of which I was not informed! And no, I was not planning on
entering your post. Typically one only enters one’s own postings.
|
|
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote:
| |
Those guys are worthless.
Dave K
|
You can say that again! ;-)
JOHN
|
Is there a silliest post contest running that I was not informed of?
|
No, but there is a bad grammar contest running; are you planning on entering
this post?
JOHN
|
Yet another contest of which I was not informed! And no, I was not planning
on entering your post. Typically one only enters one’s own postings.
|
Nearly, but no, but thanks for playing! The “this” refers to your post, not
mine. So, in essence, the question still stands to you about your post.
But I surmise that you already knew that.
JOHN
|
|
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote:
| |
Those guys are worthless.
Dave K
|
You can say that again! ;-)
JOHN
|
Is there a silliest post contest running that I was not informed of?
|
No, but there is a bad grammar contest running; are you planning on
entering this post?
JOHN
|
Yet another contest of which I was not informed! And no, I was not planning
on entering your post. Typically one only enters one’s own postings.
|
Nearly, but no, but thanks for playing! The “this” refers to your post, not
mine. So, in essence, the question still stands to you about your post.
But I surmise that you already knew that.
JOHN
|
You are clearly in the running with the post to which I am replying, as well as
the post to which I was previously replying. Imprecise referents are to be
abhorred.
However, since it is Christmas(1), I will answer your query, however malformed
it may be. No, I have no such plans, regardless of how well you think it may
fare.
1 - good will to men and other life forms and all that claptrap.
|
|
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote:
| |
Those guys are worthless.
Dave K
|
You can say that again! ;-)
JOHN
|
Is there a silliest post contest running that I was not informed of?
|
No, but there is a bad grammar contest running; are you planning on
entering this post?
JOHN
|
Yet another contest of which I was not informed! And no, I was not planning
on entering your post. Typically one only enters one’s own postings.
|
Nearly, but no, but thanks for playing! The “this” refers to your post, not
mine. So, in essence, the question still stands to you about your post.
But I surmise that you already knew that.
JOHN
|
I’m out.
(insert confused face ascii art here)
Regards
Chris
|
|
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote:
<snip>
> I'm out.
>
> (insert confused face ascii art here)
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Chris
I've been out from the beginning of this thread...
So there's always that.
Dave K
|
|
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote:
> I've been out from the beginning of this thread...
>
> So there's always that.
>
> Dave K
There are those that say I've been out from the beginning of time. Out of what,
they don't say.
|
|
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote:
>
> > I've been out from the beginning of this thread...
> >
> > So there's always that.
> >
> > Dave K
>
> There are those that say I've been out from the beginning of time. Out of what,
> they don't say.
There's dirt old... then there's Larry...
Dave K
|
|
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote:
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote:
>
>
> <snip>
>
> I've been out from the beginning of this thread...
>
> So there's always that.
>
> Dave K
I see the double post issue seems to be resolved. how did you fix it?
|
|
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote:
>
> > I've been out from the beginning of this thread...
> >
> > So there's always that.
> >
> > Dave K
>
> There are those that say I've been out from the beginning of time. Out of what,
> they don't say.
OHHHhh
OHHHHH
Mr. kotter, pick me, pick me.
Ohhhhhh
ohhhh
I know.
|
|
| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote:
> I know.
Go ahead. You know you want to.
|
|
| |
I’m trying to ascertain why Larry’s post above is the ‘Top Stories’ OF ALL
TIME!!!!
101774 times viewed!!!
So December 25, 2013--almost 6 years ago....
I think someone wrote a script that loaded Larry’s post in a browser every half
hour since December 25, 2013.
I sense some shenanigans in the ‘Universe of LUGNet Of Yor’ (1)
Dave K
1 - ULOYLUG - the ‘Old Timers Group’ (2) of people who once frequented these
here boards
2 - OTGLUG - the “Hey You Kids!! Git Off My Grass!!” (3) group of people who
once frequented these here boards and often posted in O-T.D
3 - HYKGOMGLUG - the “Outright Ornery Group” (4) of people who got to the point
they were banned for a bit from these here message boards
4 - OOGLUG - Sadly, I was denied inclusiveness to this group
|
|
|
