Subject:
|
RE: SNOT - What's the commotion about?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Wed, 6 Mar 2002 01:07:10 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
<[bram@po.cwru.edu]stopspam[]>
|
Viewed:
|
592 times
|
| |
|
|
Calum Tsang writes:
> It's not a big deal at all for Technic builders, who are very
> familiar with building on all aspects and directions.
> However, for Town and Train builders, this is a major
> departure from the way Trains have normally been done.
> Building on side allows for an increase in detail expression.
SNOT techniques in non-Technic building are generally quite different
from Technic construction because the goals are different. The goal in
non-Technic design is to fill in gaps as well as possible while adding
lots of detail, and while using parts in a different manner than they
are normally used. In Technic building, parts used on their sides or
upside down to not generally fill the same function...they either
outline a shape or orient another mechanical element in the right
direction.
--Bram
Bram Lambrecht
bram@cwru.edu
www.bldesign.org
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: SNOT - What's the commotion about?
|
| (...) It's not a big deal at all for Technic builders, who are very familiar with building on all aspects and directions. However, for Town and Train builders, this is a major departure from the way Trains have normally been done. Building on side (...) (22 years ago, 5-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
