Subject:
|
Re: NQC 2 Request
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Wed, 15 Sep 1999 06:13:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3167 times
|
| |
|
|
Its a little too late to add to the NQC 2 API, but I can add it in a later
release if people really want it. Anyone second the idea?
Dave Baum
In article <37DE2468.66B220C4@sundayta.co.uk>, David Warnock
<david@sundayta.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just wondered whether it might be handy to add OnFwdFor(motors) and
> OnRevFor(motors).
>
> Regards
>
> Dave
--
reply to: dbaum at enteract dot com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: NQC 2 Request
|
| Dave, I like the finite coltrol of the motors myself but can understand the request. It may encourage the "younger" programmers to use the language. Does adding the commands go against your move to get closer to the API? The user could always create (...) (25 years ago, 15-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
Message is in Reply To:
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
