To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcxOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / 377
376  |  378
Subject: 
Re: How advanced can RCX programming be?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Mon, 10 Jan 2000 19:23:47 GMT
Reply-To: 
mattdm@mattdm^ihatespam^.org
Viewed: 
1494 times
  
David Leeper <david.leeper@destiny.com> wrote:
If you're a computer programmer, I'd definitly suggest using something other
than the RCX Code method of writing programs for the RCX. NQC is a nice
environment if you know C. If you know a language that supports ActiveX, you

Even if you don't know C, NQC is pretty easy to learn.

--
Matthew Miller                      --->                  mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us                       --->             http://quotes-r-us.org/



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: How advanced can RCX programming be?
 
(...) You are right, Matthew. It also supports the Mac and Unix, which RCX Code and the Spirit ActiveX control don't. David Leeper (24 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: How advanced can RCX programming be?
 
Hi Tobias, If you're a computer programmer, I'd definitly suggest using something other than the RCX Code method of writing programs for the RCX. NQC is a nice environment if you know C. If you know a language that supports ActiveX, you can program (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics)

11 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR