To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.eduOpen lugnet.robotics.edu in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / Education / 174
173  |  175
Subject: 
Re: Studless building techniques
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.edu
Date: 
Sat, 7 Oct 2006 12:26:56 GMT
Viewed: 
6546 times
  
In lugnet.robotics.edu, Danny Staple wrote:

Rafe Donahue wrote:

The figures, unfortunately and arguably incorrectly,
show the [wrong lengths]

Dang. Yes, they do... and I'm ashamed to say I've known about those for some
time, and neither myself nor several other folks never picked up on that. Drat.

They can learn to count starting at zero

Since that's the way numbers work, that's how I'd teach (more to the point
that's how I *have* taught this - 3-4-5 (& other) triangles like this entered
the piture long before studless parts. I've also used the 1.5-2-2.5 version of
this.

I might suggest using 'stud' as a unit...
...maybe Lego should borrow the "LDU"...

I don't have a big problem with using "m" or "modulus" (confusion with meters is
possible... but, sadly, perhaps only for kids in Europe, where they would also
realize immediately how silly that was). As to "stud" or "LDU", well... there
are no studs (even if we adults know they are the same thing, distance-wise),
and LDU is longer. Personally, I'll still call them studs (or even just a
unitless number... "hey can you hand me that 12 long axle?").

--
Brian Davis



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Studless building techniques
 
(...) Hmm I generally use a unitless number when working with Lego here.. But I do remember having it drilled into me at school how bad that is, we had a math teacher who used to bounce up and down red in the face when people failed to mention the (...) (18 years ago, 7-Oct-06, to lugnet.robotics.edu)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Studless building techniques
 
(...) <snip> (...) building (...) Stability link. (...) 6-8-10 (...) the (...) beams (...) holes. As (...) misleading. (...) the (...) typical (...) compute the (...) hard to (...) 3-4-5 works (...) distances (...) methinks, (...) This I would be (...) (18 years ago, 7-Oct-06, to lugnet.robotics.edu)

8 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR