 | | Re: O'Reilly book news —Matthew Miller
|
| | | (...) I agree with Suzanne -- it looks shoddy and unprofessional. I don't think it's immoral or anything, but it puts them on the same psychological level as some random person with a geocities page full of banner ads. (24 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics) !
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: O'Reilly book news —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) Yeah! -- Well said! Here's what was going through my mind (and mouth :) when Suzanne showed me the page[1] earlier today: Suz: "Check this out...you're gonna love this..." (sarcasm) Todd: (seeing page on screen) "Ahh, [expletive deleted] cool (...) (24 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: O'Reilly book news —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | | (...) Y'know, I wouldn't be terribly surprised if if it turns out that the Amazon referrals aren't going to TLC at all, but rather to an employee of whatever web firm they contract out to. (24 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics) !
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: O'Reilly book news —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) We were wondering that too. It wouldn't surpise me too much if "management" there was oblivious to the fact. I guess if the URL changes anytime soon... (smile) --Todd (24 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: O'Reilly book news —Dave Baum
|
| | | | (...) I also agree about how it looks...which is basically why I don't use an associate link on the NQC site (1). Dave (1) Acutally, I even debated about putting anything at all on the NQC site about my book. (24 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
