Subject:
|
Re: NFPA article
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 10 Jan 2000 16:24:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1209 times
|
| |
|
|
> I would tend to think that it was not as well supressed as the store. I'll
> take another look at the article on monday.
I took another look at the article today, and there is nothing mentioned about
the fire. It took place last summer right? I would tend to guess that this
article had been written a long time ago, and held as a "information" type
article.
They mention 2 minor fires that had happened, but both were in public areas
from what is infered...that or the LEGO fire was considered "minor" in
nature...the building didn't suffer damage, and to NFPA $10 000 000 is a major
fire...
James P
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: NFPA article
|
| (...) I would tend to think that it was not as well supressed as the store. I'll take another look at the article on monday. James (24 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
