|
|
In lugnet.faq, Timothy P. Smith wrote:
> In lugnet.faq, Nathan Todd wrote:
> > I'm having the same problem. Is there a solution now?
> >
> > Thanks and God Bless,
> >
> > Nathan
>
> Me too!
I may be misunderstanding the problem, but I think you simply need to set up the
new address for posting messages (at http://news.lugnet.com/news/post/setup/) as
well as in your LUGNET profile.
Richie Dulin
CO Legeaux
|
|
|
In lugnet.faq, Nathan Todd wrote:
> I'm having the same problem. Is there a solution now?
>
> Thanks and God Bless,
>
> Nathan
Me too!
|
|
|
I'm having the same problem. Is there a solution now?
Thanks and God Bless,
Nathan
|
|
|
When I initially registered to Lugnet back in 2002, I had plague(at)videotron.ca
as email address.
A year later I dropped that email and entered my two new valid ones in my Lugnet
profile,
However, I cannot find any way to change it for when I post on the forums.
When I try with stephane_simard(at)videotron.ca, it tells me it can't validate
this address yet ... and sends me to the posting setup procedure page. But even
when I go through with it, it either doesn't work, or puts me back to the old
plague(at)videotron.ca
Help!
Stephane Simard (#1869)
|
|
|
dear jim,i was very impressed and touched with the articles that you put
together on my grandfather,dated 25 july 2007.Finally the credit he
deserves,such a shame he isnt here.Kind regards angie forde,grandaughter of the
man that gave us the interlocking brick
|
|
|
In lugnet.faq, Akos Kostyan wrote:
Hi Akos,
Its nice to see the LEGO community moving with the times onto more current
forms of content such as wikis. I wasnt aware of BrickWiki but it seems an
admirable community product!
Glad I could be of service for the Hungarian version as well! :-)
-Shiri
|
|
|
Hiya folks,
Was googling myself (uch, nasty habit(1)) today and saw that I havent touched
the acronym FAQ in over two years. My inclination is always to do a quick search
on the word acronym and see if anyone needs new updates, but the matter of
fact is, Im not really following lugnet at all.
So, my question to you is - is there a need for a live, updated FAQ? Or is the
old one good enuff? And, is someone interested in taking over? If so, please
let me know by email - shiri.dori AT gmail.com. (not sure how to change my
authentication email). Or, just copy the FTX source and run with it. Just dont
forget to give credit where credit is due (mostly to Derek Schin, and a bit to
yours truly ;-)
All the best,
-Shiri
(1) ...six years later: CastLEGO has finally dropped to second place after my
LinkedIn profile. Not sure when exactly that happened. Only 3 of 7 results are
lego-related (used to be 9 of 10, my DBLP page was the first to sneak in) and my
relatively-recently opened blog barely makes the
top twenty. Hehe.
|
|
|
In lugnet.lego, Thomas Main wrote:
> In lugnet.lego, Suzanne Rich wrote:
> > I've been looking around online for a copy of the LEGO Company's famous list
> > of Core Values[...]
> I just read them on the BrickFetish site:
>
> http://www.brickfetish.com/timeline/1955.html
>
> --
> Thomas Main
Ah! We were typing at the same time. Thanks, Thomas.
I see on that site that the list is labeled: "10 Important LEGO Features" rather
than "Core Values".
..Also interesting there is a list labeled:
"10 Important Requirements for LEGO Effort and Results":
1 Be objective and truthful
2 Be positive and simple
3 Be economical
4 Be international
5 Stimulate enthusiasm and inspiration
6 Encourage imagination and activity
7 Keep the Lego characteristics
8 Place the matter ahead of personal matters
9 Follow up on the matter
10 Comply with the fundamental idea
-Suz
|
|
|
In lugnet.lego, Suzanne Rich wrote:
> I've been looking around online for a copy of the LEGO Company's famous list of
> Core Values
Ah, here it is. From the book, "50 Years of Play":
The 10 LEGO Criteria for a good toy, guidelines for development of the product:
10 Important LEGO features
1. LEGO = unlimited play potential
2. LEGO = for girls, for boys
3. LEGO = fun for every age
4. LEGO = year-round play
5. LEGO = healthy, quiet play
6. LEGO = long hours of play
7. LEGO = development, imagination, creativity
8. LEGO = the more LEGO, the greater its value
9. LEGO = extra sets available
10 LEGO = quality in every detail
And of course there was the motto from the 1930's"
"Only the best is good enough."
So, perhaps I was incorrect in having thought this list was of "core values". It
seems like they were more like "product guidelines". (sorry!)
According to a press release in 2001, the core values were: imagination,
creativity and fun. The newest diagram adds two more: quality and learning.
-Suz
|
|
|