Subject:
|
Re: hey gyug... a suggestion
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sun, 21 Feb 1999 19:56:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
609 times
|
| |
|
|
Seeing as Jeremy has written more code for the upcoming 1.6 release
than I have, he's a pretty good authority on the subject. I'll try hard
to get his ldraw-options-dialog-box in the next release.
As for the bitmaps, a two-pass auto-sizing feature would be useful,
and we may get that for "free" with the changes to support for
MPD files. I've been wanting to generate bitmaps larger than
the screen for some time, so a -V option with x,y specifications
makes sense. Also, I'm thinking of a modified bitmap-save that
does not crop to the smallest size, but keeps the full size, so
you can easily do animated GIFs.
-gyug
Sproaticus wrote:
> onyx wrote:
> > one thing that would be nice in the LDLite view dialog would be
> > the ability to translate the model's position...
> I can safely say that this would be relatively easy to do. I won't speak
> for Gyug, but I wouldn't be surprised if this feature wasn't in the next
> version of LDLite.
> ...
> I've been thinking about this, and it seems like it would be more work than
> would be practical. However, LDLite *might* use the -V command-line option
> with two numbers, to indicate the size of the bitmap; then use scrollbars to
> allow for really large bitmaps for any size window, and possibly even center
> the bitmap from the start.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: hey gyug... a suggestion
|
| (...) How about an option to simulate antialiasing by rendering the image internally at 2x and resampling for display? (Or at the very least, an option to render the image on-screen at 2x or 3x normal size, with thicker lines? That way, I could (...) (25 years ago, 21-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: hey gyug... a suggestion
|
| (...) I can safely say that this would be relatively easy to do. I won't speak for Gyug, but I wouldn't be surprised if this feature wasn't in the next version of LDLite. (...) I've been thinking about this, and it seems like it would be more work (...) (25 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
