 | | Re: You wouldn't want one of these landing at your Airport!
|
|
(...) No, not really. (...) That would be really cool! See if you can find it. :D eric (24 years ago, 12-Mar-00, to lugnet.build, lugnet.town, lugnet.admin.council)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Cleaning up the main homepage
|
|
(...) Hmm. Well, in the great usenet tradition of "if you agree with it, don't post", we probably have consensus that Frank's ideas are good (but I'll have to go hunt and confirm, for myself). My questions (mostly for Todd) are: Have you got the (...) (24 years ago, 10-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.council)
|
| |
| | Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups.
|
|
On top of this I also believe we should be allowed to post any trade's in the Theme groups also, as long as you are posting in the proper genre. I don't believe all the info should be in there, though you can post an intent and do the rest by e-mail (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.council, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 4811 Defense Archer
|
|
(...) Trade offers, especially that spawn out of the discussion, aren't particularly wrong. It depends on the group, and the level of tolerance for such, mostly. loc.uk has actually discussed, and set rough guidelines for trades allowed. All the (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.council)
|
| |
| | Re: 398 (uss constelation) question
|
|
(...) Hi Jonathan, It sounds to me like you're planning to run an auction. Please announce this ONLY in lugnet.market.auction, where auction announcements belong. Or, if the message relates to previous context, set the Followup-to (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.council)
|
| |
| | Re: 6557 LEGOfest offer
|
|
(...) Yep, I wasn't about to fry him - no biggie. Richard (24 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.council)
|
| |
| | Re: 6557 LEGOfest offer
|
|
I've no problem with this. I'm sure all Steve has done is click "reply to group" rather than "reply to sender"... a mistake I make quite often. Scott A (24 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.council)
|
| |
| | Re: 6557 LEGOfest offer
|
|
(...) Hi Steve, I'm not jumping on your back, but this might have been better as a private email. I agree that it is a bit confusing because in lugnet.loc.uk we do discuss inter-uk trades and sales, but there the implication is that it is a UK only (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.council)
|
| |
| | Re: Please, just end the entire thing! ( was: Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?)
|
|
(...) Hmm. Erin, while I can understand some frustration about vast threads of controversy, it's relevant to note that this conversation is happening exactly where it's supposed to: lugnet.OFF-TOPIC.debate (emphasis mine). Quoting relevant text: (...) (24 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.council)
|
| |
| | Re: Is a FUT .market.auction okay?
|
|
(...) I would tend to think that if they're looking for an item at a certain price, they will not be terribly interested in an auction. If you're running a private auction (automated or not), I would contact the interested party and indicate that (...) (24 years ago, 25-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.council)
|
| |
| | Re: Pure theory on castle auction ...
|
|
(...) One problem was that one had to read carefully to parse that you were not pluging your auction, but that the auction was pluging Castle World. Unless things change, it seems to be acceptable to reference an auction in another discussion, but (...) (24 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.admin.council)
|
| |
| | Re: Self Organisation (Was: Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images)
|
|
(...) I think that may have been a misunderstanding though - the thread was trying to nominate someone who would recieve ideas on what the council should do, how it should work, how it should be planned. But I agree - things are moving fast - the (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.council)
|
| |
| | Self Organization (was Re: Self Organisation
|
|
(...) Well I *did* say "most". :-) But yes, I consider myself highly regarded by at least one member of the community. Me. FUT off-topic.fun (24 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.council, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Self Organisation (Was: Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images)
|
|
(...) that (...) base (...) to (...) I did not mean to infer, but I did assume it to be the case. (...) You include yourself in this? :-) I must admit, I find this whole development rather interesting. I anticipate that, if LUGNet continues to grow, (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.council)
|
| |
| | Re: Self Organisation (Was: Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images)
|
|
(...) Good point. If you infer that I was invited you would be correct... It's not my place to reveal who else Todd invited, it's Todd's, so you'll have to take my word for this, but I do know who he invited, at least in the first round, and I would (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.council)
|
| |
| | Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images
|
|
(...) Can you provide an example of something they prevent that is reasonable and necessary? (...) I didn't say you thought that they didn't work in any possible circumstance. I didn't say that *I* thought they didn't work in any possible (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.council)
|
| |
| | Re: Self Organisation (Was: Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images)
|
|
(...) I've been watching this discussion over the past few days. Mainly because my name popped up in a proportion of the posts - the reasons for which are clear. It is apparent to me that if .council is to work (ie discuss, deliberate, arbitrate, (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.council)
|
| |
| | Re: Self Organisation (Was: Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images)
|
|
All in favor? I think Frank just got himself a chair. (1) Rereading my post 2 refs back it looks like I was saying I'd be chair if asked. What I actually meant was I'd be a committee member if asked. 1 - Seriously... step one in organizing a (...) (24 years ago, 20-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.council)
|
| |
| | Re: Huge "CLASSIC TOWN AUCTION" Hello from Mike
|
|
(...) Welcome, Mike! (...) It's always great to see more Town auctions, but I recommend that you re-read the LUGNET Terms of Use (URL) which you agreed to when you signed up for posting privileges. In particular, note that auctions announcements (...) (24 years ago, 20-Feb-00, to lugnet.town, lugnet.admin.council)
|
