|
|
 | | Re: You wouldn't want one of these landing at your Airport!
|
| (...) No, not really. (...) That would be really cool! See if you can find it. :D eric (24 years ago, 12-Mar-00, to lugnet.build, lugnet.town, lugnet.admin.council)
| | | | | (canceled)
|
| | | | | | Re: Cleaning up the main homepage
|
| (...) Hmm. Well, in the great usenet tradition of "if you agree with it, don't post", we probably have consensus that Frank's ideas are good (but I'll have to go hunt and confirm, for myself). My questions (mostly for Todd) are: Have you got the (...) (24 years ago, 10-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.council)
| | | | | Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups.
|
| On top of this I also believe we should be allowed to post any trade's in the Theme groups also, as long as you are posting in the proper genre. I don't believe all the info should be in there, though you can post an intent and do the rest by e-mail (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.council, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: 4811 Defense Archer
|
| (...) Trade offers, especially that spawn out of the discussion, aren't particularly wrong. It depends on the group, and the level of tolerance for such, mostly. loc.uk has actually discussed, and set rough guidelines for trades allowed. All the (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.council)
| | | | | Re: 398 (uss constelation) question
|
| (...) Hi Jonathan, It sounds to me like you're planning to run an auction. Please announce this ONLY in lugnet.market.auction, where auction announcements belong. Or, if the message relates to previous context, set the Followup-to (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.council)
| | | | | Re: 6557 LEGOfest offer
|
| (...) Yep, I wasn't about to fry him - no biggie. Richard (24 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.council)
| | | | | Re: 6557 LEGOfest offer
|
| I've no problem with this. I'm sure all Steve has done is click "reply to group" rather than "reply to sender"... a mistake I make quite often. Scott A (24 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.council)
| | | | | Re: 6557 LEGOfest offer
|
| (...) Hi Steve, I'm not jumping on your back, but this might have been better as a private email. I agree that it is a bit confusing because in lugnet.loc.uk we do discuss inter-uk trades and sales, but there the implication is that it is a UK only (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.council)
| | | | | Re: Please, just end the entire thing! ( was: Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?)
|
| (...) Hmm. Erin, while I can understand some frustration about vast threads of controversy, it's relevant to note that this conversation is happening exactly where it's supposed to: lugnet.OFF-TOPIC.debate (emphasis mine). Quoting relevant text: (...) (24 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.council)
|
|
