Xref: lugnet.com lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc:123
Newsgroups: lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
Path: lugnet.com!dbaum
From: dbaum@spambgoneenteract.com (Dave Baum)
X-Real-Life-Name: Dave Baum
Subject: Re: NQC 2 Request
X-Newsreader: MT-NewsWatcher 2.4.4
Organization: None
Message-ID: <dbaum-1509991838360001@207-229-150-88.d.enteract.com>
References: <37DE2468.66B220C4@sundayta.co.uk>
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: 207-229-150-88.d.enteract.com
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 23:38:35 GMT
Lines: 24

In article <37DE2468.66B220C4@sundayta.co.uk>, David Warnock
<david@sundayta.co.uk> wrote:

>I just wondered whether it might be handy to add OnFwdFor(motors) and
>OnRevFor(motors).
>

If anyone wants to add these functions into their own code...

void OnFwdFor(const int m, const int &t) { Fwd(m); OnFor(m, t); }
void OnRevFor(const int m, const int &t) { Rev(m); OnFor(m, t); }

These should be efficient - everything will be inlined and no temporaries
will be created - unless a temporary is needed during the computation of
t...

int x, y;
OnFwdFor(x); // ok, no temporary
OnFwdFor(x+y);  // need temp to compute x+y

Dave

-- 
reply to: dbaum at enteract dot com